How do we
know who is speaking?
Question: We recorded three
messages in the same male voice. We could not
recognize the voice, or what the messages might
mean. Why would he be contacting us? How can we find
out who he is? And why are the messages so
ominous...?
Answer:
We like to see people test these phenomena for
themselves. While it is relatively easy to record an
EVP, it is quite another problem to understand who
is speaking and why. First I should say that the
examples at aaevp.com have been selected from
hundreds of recordings members have made. Even the
Butlers might record many times before finding an
utterance which is suitable for sharing with others.
Most EVP are words spoken by
strangers. Tom Butler compares a recording session
to calling a distant telephone booth. Someone may
answer, but when they do, you have only what they
say to tell you who it might be. Sometimes a friend
answers, but most often it seems that a passing
stranger picks up the phone.
We think we look like energy to our
etheric communicators. Rather than the imagined
ghost looking into our room as if through a window,
we think a better model is a field of energy in
which each of us is a nexus of brightness. Others
probably "look" at us by turning their attention to
us, and when they do, they probably see us as we see
ourselves. Right now, I am sitting in my office
typing on the computer keyboard. I am dressed to go
shopping and the day is exceptionally cool for this
time of year. I see myself as this. We think my
"light" tells others my self-image, and it is
through my personally visualized reality that others
can know who I am. When we are perceived, we can
also perceive the perceiver if we would take the
time to learn and do so. So this is a
personality-to-personality exchange of information
in the etheric. The physical exists as our local
construct and has little to do with the
communicators. That is the model that seems to
explain what we are learning via our etheric
studies.
When you record, you express a
desire for communication, but when communication
occurs, you or an interested observer must transform
the information into a physical form. We think that
the actual voice formation occurs in the recorder as
the transformation of available audio-frequency
energy under the influence of a weak telekinetic
signal. This is initiated by the communicator but
actually implemented by an etheric personality in
a physical body.
The communicator may have a memory
of a language from a previous physical lifetime, but
it could be one from anywhere in reality and is not
restricted to a person who once lived in the
physical. Because it is brought into the physical as
a concept that must be translated into physical
words via your personality, it is expressed in a
language we understand and in terms which agree
with our expectations. That is why we think EVP are
virtually always in a language we or an interested
observer understands, and why people who think the
entities must be stuck in haunted houses record
messages that confirms their expectation. The actual
communication may come as a concept such as "I would
like to talk to you" but be recorded as "help me."
The Butlers would probably record the message as
"communicate with me" because they do not think the
entity is stuck anywhere.
So in answer to your questions, The
communicator
may be simply responding to your call for
communication. You could ask who he is but like the
distant public telephone, he may not be passing by
again. The message is in the eyes of the perceiver.
What you quoted does not sound ominous to me. The
communicators do not at first always understand who
we are or where we are. They are also in a larger
community. No telling what the personality
experienced on his end of the circuit, but it is
possible that "It's mine" was directed at another
personality as "I will respond." We see a lot of
"They can see us" messages that are clearly directed
at other etheric personalities. And don't forget
that, when you transition, you will probably
continue to construct a local reality. The etheric
personality might actually answer a telephone
because that would be a familiar act.
Question: Can my friend on the other side help me
make money at the horse races?
Answer: One of the ways skeptics dismiss any
form of communication across the veil is by asking
why mediums are not all rich by winning the lottery
or picking the right horse in a race? We believe the answer is
that the communicators live in a world that is much
more conceptual than ours. While they experience
life as senses, feelings and comprehension, we
experience life as interaction with things and
learning to distinguish kinds of objects. The
concept expressed as an impression of color and
beauty might come to us as a flower. In fact, what
flower we sense as a medium would depend on what we
pull out of our personal library of images. The
communicator tries to covey the essence of flower
because we think that is how they experience
reality. We turn that essence into a specific yellow
rose.
The communicator also senses our physical world
through our senses. We are pretty sure we are just
energy to them, and that all of the communication is
our etheric Self communicating with their etheric
Self as thought balls or gestalt packets of energy
containing what we or they intend. If we see
ourselves wearing a red shirt in a room with a
recorder in front of us, they will be able to
reflect that information back to us in an EVP
message, but not because they see us; it will be
because they see through our etheric Self how we see
ourselves.
So our impression at this time is that they see
potential futures as energy, but probably through
our senses. Your friend may be able to pick the
right horse because he may be able to "sense" the
potential to win from the handler, but if the
probable winning horse is named "Lone Gambler," the
EVP might say "bad habit." The habit is one of the
concepts associated with gambling. So in other
words, your friend would talk to you via impressions
and images that are conceptual and your mind would
turn them into concrete terms. It could happen, but
it would be a long shot for you to pull up the right
translation for the right horse.